On Wed, Nov 8, 2023 at 4:12 AM Paul Moore <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 8:32 AM Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Some of the default return values listed in <linux/lsm_hook_defs.h> > > don't match the actual no-op value and can be trivially fixed. > > > > Ondrej Mosnacek (2): > > lsm: fix default return value for vm_enough_memory > > lsm: fix default return value for inode_getsecctx > > > > include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h | 4 ++-- > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > These both look like reasonable -stable candidates to me, what do you think? Yes, that would be my assessment as well. -- Ondrej Mosnacek Senior Software Engineer, Linux Security - SELinux kernel Red Hat, Inc.
