On 1 Nov 2023, at 5:06, Martin Wege wrote: > Good morning! > > We have questions about NFSv4 referrals: > 1. Is there a way to test them in Debian Linux? > > 2. How does a fs_locations attribute look like when a nonstandard port > like 6666 is used? > RFC5661 says this: > > * http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5661#section-11.9 > * 11.9. The Attribute fs_locations > * An entry in the server array is a UTF-8 string and represents one of a > * traditional DNS host name, IPv4 address, IPv6 address, or a zero-length > * string. An IPv4 or IPv6 address is represented as a universal address > * (see Section 3.3.9 and [15]), minus the netid, and either with or without > * the trailing ".p1.p2" suffix that represents the port number. If the > * suffix is omitted, then the default port, 2049, SHOULD be assumed. A > * zero-length string SHOULD be used to indicate the current address being > * used for the RPC call. > > Does anyone have an example of how the content of fs_locations should > look like with a custom port number? If you keep following the references, you end up with the example in rfc5665, which gives an example for IPv4: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc5665#section-5.2.3.3 Ben
