Re: [PATCH 0/5] sunrpc: not refcounting svc_serv

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 01 Nov 2023, Chuck Lever III wrote:
> 
> > On Oct 29, 2023, at 6:08 PM, NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > This patch set continues earlier work of improving how threads and
> > services are managed.  Specifically it drop the refcount.
> > 
> > The refcount is always changed under the mutex, and almost always is
> > exactly equal to the number of threads.  Those few cases where it is
> > more than the number of threads can usefully be handled other ways as
> > see in the patches.
> > 
> > The first patches fixes a potential use-after-free when adding a socket
> > fails.  This might be the UAF that Jeff mentioned recently.
> > 
> > The second patch which removes the use of a refcount in pool_stats
> > handling is more complex than I would have liked, but I think it is
> > worth if for the result seen in 4/5 of substantial simplification.
> 
> So I need a v2 of this series, then...
> 
>  - Move 4/5 to the beginning of the series (patch 1 or 2, doesn't matter)

I don't understand....  2 and 3 are necessary prerequisites for 4.  The
remove places where the refcount is used.

> 
>  - Add R-b, Fixes, and Cc: stable tags to those two patches

Will do

> 
>  - Address Jeff's other comments

Yep.

> 
> AFAICT the 0-day bot reports were for the admin-revoked state series,
> not this one.

Agreed.

NeilBrown

> 
> 
> --
> Chuck Lever
> 
> 
> 




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux