On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 10:30 AM Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 09:35:29AM +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 9:08 AM Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 11:55:53PM +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote: > > > > Split the exportfs entry from the nfsd entry and add myself as reviewer. > > > > > > I think exportfs is by now very much VFS code. > > > > > > > Yes, that's the idea of making it a vfs sub-entry in MAINTAINERS. > > > > Is that an ACK? or did you mean that something needs to change > > in the patch? > > I as mostly thinking of dropping the diretory and the separate entry. > That would also go along with your patch of making it a bool. > > But if you feel strongly about that we can add you as an extra reviewer > for it :) I don't have a strong opinion about this. I am submitting this patch on behalf of the current export maintainers who requested to stay as maintainers of fs/exportfs and offered that I join as a reviewer of fs/exportfs. I cannot join as a reviewer of nfsd, hence this needs an entry. Thanks, Amir.
