J. Bruce Fields wrote:
I still don't understand quite what was happening: in the absence of "noacl", does the client just always claim to support the posix acl xattr's, but return an error when cp attempts to set them?
I didn't monitor the wire so I can only guess. My guess is 'yes'. However, given that the client also falsely that it couldn't preserve permissions I'm not sure what's really going on. -- Jon Forrest Research Computing Support College of Chemistry 173 Tan Hall University of California Berkeley Berkeley, CA 94720-1460 510-643-1032 jlforrest@xxxxxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
