On 10/08/2009 01:37 PM, Chuck Lever wrote:
> Don't try NFSv4 if any MNT protocol related options were presented by
> the user.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> utils/mount/stropts.c | 7 +++++++
> 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/utils/mount/stropts.c b/utils/mount/stropts.c
> index 0685caa..3401f63 100644
> --- a/utils/mount/stropts.c
> +++ b/utils/mount/stropts.c
> @@ -564,6 +564,13 @@ static int nfs_try_mount_v4(struct nfsmount_info *mi)
> }
>
> if (mi->version == 0) {
> + if (po_contains(options, "mounthost") ||
> + po_contains(options, "mountaddr") ||
> + po_contains(options, "mountvers") ||
> + po_contains(options, "mountproto")) {
> + errno = EPROTONOSUPPORT;
> + goto out_fail;
> + }
I think it make senses to assume the version negation should
start version 3 when mountXXXX options exist instead of
failing a mount they probably didn't want..
steved.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
