> The problems with the code remain, and you will need to change it in > order to make it acceptable. The question I haven't seen you asking, and > that you should have be asking from the very start is "what would be the > minimal set of changes?". I too would like to see what are minimal change set would be... Just to see how much a db is really needed... If at all.. Now with that said... I've taken on the task of how to deal with pNFS exports and it might make sense that a db is need to deal with that complexity... So I'm not totally against the idea of introducing a db to nfs-utils I just think we need to do it for the right reason.... steved. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html