Re: [PATCH 1/4] nfs-utils: introduce new statd implementation (1st part)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> The problems with the code remain, and you will need to change it in
> order to make it acceptable. The question I haven't seen you asking, and
> that you should have be asking from the very start is "what would be the
> minimal set of changes?".

I too would like to see what are minimal change set would be... Just
to see how much a db is really needed... If at all.. 

Now with that said... I've taken on the task of how to deal with
pNFS exports and it might make sense that a db is need to deal with
that complexity...  So I'm not totally against the idea of introducing 
a db to nfs-utils I just think we need to do it for the right reason....

steved.
 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux