From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 12:04:07 +0800 > This fixed a lockdep warning which appeared when doing stress > memory tests over NFS: > > inconsistent {RECLAIM_FS-ON-W} -> {IN-RECLAIM_FS-W} usage. > > page reclaim => nfs_writepage => tcp_sendmsg => lock sk_lock > > mount_root => nfs_root_data => tcp_close => lock sk_lock => > tcp_send_fin => alloc_skb_fclone => page reclaim > > David raised a concern that if the allocation fails in tcp_send_fin(), and it's > GFP_ATOMIC, we are going to yield() (which sleeps) and loop endlessly waiting > for the allocation to succeed. > > But fact is, the original GFP_KERNEL also sleeps. GFP_ATOMIC+yield() looks > weird, but it is no worse the implicit sleep inside GFP_KERNEL. Both could > loop endlessly under memory pressure. > > CC: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > CC: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > CC: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx> Applied to net-next-2.6, thanks! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html