On 09/02/2009 09:51 AM, Chuck Lever wrote: > Sorry for the repost. After reading the patch descriptions again, I > thought they needed some clarification. > > --- > > Chuck Lever (4): > NFS: Allow the "nfs" file system type to support NFSv4 > NFS: Move details of nfs4_get_sb() to a helper > NFS: Refactor NFSv4 text-based mount option validation > NFS: Mount option parser should detect missing "port=" > > > fs/nfs/internal.h | 10 ++ > fs/nfs/super.c | 202 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------- > include/linux/nfs4.h | 1 > 3 files changed, 144 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-) > Trond, is there an ETA on this? </rant> We've turned a simple 2 patch solution into a 4 user space patches and 4 kernel patches to simply added a short cut to mount the nfs4 file system... If this not an example of over engineering then I don't know what its... </rant> steved. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
