On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 18:38 -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > Boot of a kvm guest to a kernel including your latest for-2.6.32 is getting the > following. (Also includes some stuff of mine which I wouldn't expect to be > relevant, but you never know.) > > --b. > > BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null) > IP: [<c10ae4c4>] sget+0x74/0x410 > *pde = 00000000 > Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT > last sysfs file: > Modules linked in: > > Pid: 1, comm: swapper Not tainted (2.6.31-rc6-00109-g7de6644 #282) > EIP: 0060:[<c10ae4c4>] EFLAGS: 00010286 CPU: 0 > EIP is at sget+0x74/0x410 > EAX: c1a0f440 EBX: fffffefc ECX: c10adc90 EDX: 00000000 > ESI: 00000000 EDI: 00000000 EBP: c7867e50 ESP: c7867e24 > DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 0000 GS: 0000 SS: 0068 > Process swapper (pid: 1, ti=c7866000 task=c7864020 task.ti=c7866000) > Stack: > c10a884f c10c4cab c10adca0 c10adc90 c1a0f440 c1a0f458 c1a0f460 c1a0f468 > <0> c7817258 c21348bc 00000000 c7867e6c c10aed3f 00000000 00000000 c7817258 > <0> c21348bc c1a0f440 c7867e7c c16d8181 c16d8a70 c7817258 c7867ea4 c10aeb4e > Call Trace: > [<c10a884f>] ? __kmalloc_track_caller+0x1bf/0x240 > [<c10c4cab>] ? alloc_vfsmnt+0x8b/0x130 > [<c10adca0>] ? set_anon_super+0x0/0xf0 > [<c10adc90>] ? compare_single+0x0/0x10 > [<c10aed3f>] ? get_sb_single+0x2f/0xb0 > [<c16d8181>] ? rpc_get_sb+0x21/0x30 > [<c16d8a70>] ? rpc_fill_super+0x0/0xc0 > [<c10aeb4e>] ? vfs_kern_mount+0x5e/0x120 > [<c10c8c00>] ? simple_pin_fs+0x80/0xc0 > [<c16d978c>] ? rpc_get_mount+0x1c/0x30 > [<c11db48b>] ? nfs_cache_register+0x1b/0x90 > [<c10a00a3>] ? map_vm_area+0x33/0x50 > [<c10c2ef8>] ? register_filesystem+0x48/0x80 > [<c10c2f18>] ? register_filesystem+0x68/0x80 > [<c1a30e30>] ? init_nfs_fs+0x0/0x154 > [<c11daf82>] ? nfs_dns_resolver_init+0x12/0x20 > [<c1a30e3c>] ? init_nfs_fs+0xc/0x154 > [<c1a30d53>] ? init_iso9660_fs+0x4a/0x69 > [<c11bf1e0>] ? init_once+0x0/0x20 > [<c100111f>] ? do_one_initcall+0x2f/0x150 > [<c10f7b00>] ? proc_create_data+0x80/0xb0 > [<c1063072>] ? register_irq_proc+0x92/0xb0 > [<c1a204c5>] ? kernel_init+0x9e/0xf5 > [<c1a20427>] ? kernel_init+0x0/0xf5 > [<c100361b>] ? kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x10 > Code: 8b 45 e4 8b 50 18 eb 1d 8d b4 26 00 00 00 00 8b 55 08 89 d8 ff 55 e0 85 c0 0f 85 50 02 00 00 8b 93 04 01 00 00 8d 9a fc fe ff ff <8b> 83 04 01 00 00 0f 18 00 90 39 55 e8 75 d5 85 f6 0f 85 06 03 > EIP: [<c10ae4c4>] sget+0x74/0x410 SS:ESP 0068:c7867e24 > CR2: 0000000000000000 Hmm... Is that with NFS and SUNRPC built in? If so, does it also happen when NFS (but not necessarily SUNRPC) is a module? I'm wondering if the problem is that we need to ensure ordering of init functions here... Trond -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
