On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 02:14:50PM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 02:07:04PM -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote: > > On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 13:49 -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > Is there really a reason to keep a separate NFSv4 mailing list? v4 > > > support is part of the same nfs/nfsd modules and quite deeply > > > interwinded with the v2/v3 code. It seems most posts to the NFSv4 list > > > get cross-posted to the regular nfs list anyway. > > > > I certainly agree that we can start deprecating the nfsv4@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > list, but I'm reluctant to shut it down completely as long as we're > > seeing some non-cross posted traffic there. > > > > How about if we keep it open for another 6 months, and use that time to > > educate those people who post only on nfsv4@xxxxxxxxxxxxx to move on to > > linux-nfs? > > How about just turning the nfsv4 list into an auto-responder telling > people to use the linux-nfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx? Either's fine with me. --b. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
