On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 03:22:38PM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
> The extra call to cache_revisit_request in cache_fresh_unlocked is not
> needed, as should have been fairly clear at the time of
> commit 4013edea9a0b6cdcb1fdf5d4011e47e068fd6efb
>
> If there are requests to be revisited, then we can be sure that
> CACHE_PENDING is set, so the second call is sufficient.
Yes: the only cache_make_upcall() caller (cache_check()) sets
CACHE_PENDING first. And a grep for CACHE_PENDING verifies that
everyone that clears it immediately calls either cache_revisit_request()
or cache_dequeue(). OK!
Thanks, applied.--b.
>
> So remove the first call.
> Then remove the 'new' parameter,
> then remove the return value for cache_fresh_locked which is only used
> to provide the value for 'new'.
>
> Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> net/sunrpc/cache.c | 23 ++++++++++-------------
> 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/cache.c b/net/sunrpc/cache.c
> index 44f4516..c1f897c 100644
> --- a/net/sunrpc/cache.c
> +++ b/net/sunrpc/cache.c
> @@ -103,18 +103,16 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sunrpc_cache_lookup);
>
> static void cache_dequeue(struct cache_detail *detail, struct cache_head *ch);
>
> -static int cache_fresh_locked(struct cache_head *head, time_t expiry)
> +static void cache_fresh_locked(struct cache_head *head, time_t expiry)
> {
> head->expiry_time = expiry;
> head->last_refresh = get_seconds();
> - return !test_and_set_bit(CACHE_VALID, &head->flags);
> + set_bit(CACHE_VALID, &head->flags);
> }
>
> static void cache_fresh_unlocked(struct cache_head *head,
> - struct cache_detail *detail, int new)
> + struct cache_detail *detail)
> {
> - if (new)
> - cache_revisit_request(head);
> if (test_and_clear_bit(CACHE_PENDING, &head->flags)) {
> cache_revisit_request(head);
> cache_dequeue(detail, head);
> @@ -130,7 +128,6 @@ struct cache_head *sunrpc_cache_update(struct cache_detail *detail,
> */
> struct cache_head **head;
> struct cache_head *tmp;
> - int is_new;
>
> if (!test_bit(CACHE_VALID, &old->flags)) {
> write_lock(&detail->hash_lock);
> @@ -139,9 +136,9 @@ struct cache_head *sunrpc_cache_update(struct cache_detail *detail,
> set_bit(CACHE_NEGATIVE, &old->flags);
> else
> detail->update(old, new);
> - is_new = cache_fresh_locked(old, new->expiry_time);
> + cache_fresh_locked(old, new->expiry_time);
> write_unlock(&detail->hash_lock);
> - cache_fresh_unlocked(old, detail, is_new);
> + cache_fresh_unlocked(old, detail);
> return old;
> }
> write_unlock(&detail->hash_lock);
> @@ -165,11 +162,11 @@ struct cache_head *sunrpc_cache_update(struct cache_detail *detail,
> *head = tmp;
> detail->entries++;
> cache_get(tmp);
> - is_new = cache_fresh_locked(tmp, new->expiry_time);
> + cache_fresh_locked(tmp, new->expiry_time);
> cache_fresh_locked(old, 0);
> write_unlock(&detail->hash_lock);
> - cache_fresh_unlocked(tmp, detail, is_new);
> - cache_fresh_unlocked(old, detail, 0);
> + cache_fresh_unlocked(tmp, detail);
> + cache_fresh_unlocked(old, detail);
> cache_put(old, detail);
> return tmp;
> }
> @@ -224,8 +221,8 @@ int cache_check(struct cache_detail *detail,
> cache_revisit_request(h);
> if (rv == -EAGAIN) {
> set_bit(CACHE_NEGATIVE, &h->flags);
> - cache_fresh_unlocked(h, detail,
> - cache_fresh_locked(h, get_seconds()+CACHE_NEW_EXPIRY));
> + cache_fresh_locked(h, get_seconds()+CACHE_NEW_EXPIRY);
> + cache_fresh_unlocked(h, detail);
> rv = -ENOENT;
> }
> break;
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
