'loose' was a mis-spelling of 'lose', and even that wasn't a good
word choice.
So give this function a more useful name.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
---
net/sunrpc/cache.c | 8 ++++----
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/sunrpc/cache.c b/net/sunrpc/cache.c
index ff0c230..d19c075 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/cache.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/cache.c
@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ struct cache_head *sunrpc_cache_lookup(struct cache_detail *detail,
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sunrpc_cache_lookup);
-static void queue_loose(struct cache_detail *detail, struct cache_head *ch);
+static void cache_dequeue(struct cache_detail *detail, struct cache_head *ch);
static int cache_fresh_locked(struct cache_head *head, time_t expiry)
{
@@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ static void cache_fresh_unlocked(struct cache_head *head,
cache_revisit_request(head);
if (test_and_clear_bit(CACHE_PENDING, &head->flags)) {
cache_revisit_request(head);
- queue_loose(detail, head);
+ cache_dequeue(detail, head);
}
}
@@ -457,7 +457,7 @@ static int cache_clean(void)
)
continue;
if (test_and_clear_bit(CACHE_PENDING, &ch->flags))
- queue_loose(current_detail, ch);
+ cache_dequeue(current_detail, ch);
if (atomic_read(&ch->ref.refcount) == 1)
break;
@@ -920,7 +920,7 @@ static const struct file_operations cache_file_operations = {
};
-static void queue_loose(struct cache_detail *detail, struct cache_head *ch)
+static void cache_dequeue(struct cache_detail *detail, struct cache_head *ch)
{
struct cache_queue *cq;
spin_lock(&queue_lock);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
