On Mon, 2009-07-06 at 12:31 -0400, Chuck Lever wrote: > I have considered that. AF_LOCAL in fact could replace all of our > upcall mechanisms. However, portmapper, which doesn't support > AF_LOCAL, is still used in some distributions. As could AF_NETLINK, fork(), pipes, fifos, etc... Again: why would we want to saddle ourselves with rpc over AF_LOCAL? -- Trond Myklebust Linux NFS client maintainer NetApp Trond.Myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx www.netapp.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
