On 6/15/09 5:42 PM, "Ricardo Labiaga" <ricardo.labiaga@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 6/15/09 5:27 PM, "Trond Myklebust" <Trond.Myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 2009-05-01 at 02:25 +0300, Benny Halevy wrote:
>>> From: Ricardo Labiaga <Ricardo.Labiaga@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> Validates the callback's sessionID, the slot number, and the sequence ID.
>>> Increments the slot's sequence.
>>>
>>> Detects replays, but simply prints a debug message (if debugging is enabled
>>> since we don't yet implement a duplicate request cache for the backchannel.
>>> This should not present a problem, since only idempotent callbacks are
>>> currently implemented.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Ricardo Labiaga <Ricardo.Labiaga@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Signed-off-by: Benny Halevy <bhalevy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> fs/nfs/callback_proc.c | 75
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>>> 1 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/fs/nfs/callback_proc.c b/fs/nfs/callback_proc.c
>>> index 6b342e8..c85d66f 100644
>>> --- a/fs/nfs/callback_proc.c
>>> +++ b/fs/nfs/callback_proc.c
>>> @@ -105,6 +105,57 @@ out:
>>> #if defined(CONFIG_NFS_V4_1)
>>>
>>> /*
>>> + * Validate the sequenceID sent by the server.
>>> + * Return success if the sequenceID is one more than what we last saw on
>>> + * this slot, accounting for wraparound. Increments the slot's sequence.
>>> + *
>>> + * We don't yet implement a duplicate request cache, so at this time
>>> + * we will log replays, and process them as if we had not seen them before,
>>> + * but we don't bump the sequence in the slot. Not too worried about it,
>>> + * since we only currently implement idempotent callbacks anyway.
>>> + *
>>> + * We have a single slot backchannel at this time, so we don't bother
>>> + * checking the used_slots bit array on the table. The lower layer
>>> guarantees
>>> + * a single outstanding callback request at a time.
>>> + */
>>> +static int
>>> +validate_seqid(struct nfs4_slot_table *tbl, u32 slotid, u32 seqid)
>>> +{
>>> + struct nfs4_slot *slot;
>>> +
>>> + dprintk("%s enter. slotid %d seqid %d\n",
>>> + __func__, slotid, seqid);
>>> +
>>> + if (slotid > NFS41_BC_MAX_CALLBACKS)
>>> + return NFS4ERR_BADSLOT;
>>
>> I thought we agreed to always return error values as _negative_? Why the
>> change here?
>>
>
> Will change to negative.
>
Looking at this more closely, this is the error that we encode into the XDR
result, so it's okay for it to be positive. I'll change it to use htonl()
in this function to avoid confusion, instead of setting htonl() in its
caller.
- ricardo
> - ricardo
>
>>> +
>>> + slot = tbl->slots + slotid;
>>> + dprintk("%s slot table seqid: %d\n", __func__, slot->seq_nr);
>>> +
>>> + /* Normal */
>>> + if (likely(seqid == slot->seq_nr + 1)) {
>>> + slot->seq_nr++;
>>> + return NFS4_OK;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + /* Replay */
>>> + if (seqid == slot->seq_nr) {
>>> + dprintk("%s seqid %d is a replay - no DRC available\n",
>>> + __func__, seqid);
>>> + return NFS4_OK;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + /* Wraparound */
>>> + if (seqid == 1 && (slot->seq_nr + 1) == 0) {
>>> + slot->seq_nr = 1;
>>> + return NFS4_OK;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + /* Misordered request */
>>> + return NFS4ERR_SEQ_MISORDERED;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +/*
>>> * Returns a pointer to a held 'struct nfs_client' that matches the
>>> server's
>>> * address, major version number, and session ID. It is the caller's
>>> * responsibility to release the returned reference.
>>> @@ -140,18 +191,27 @@ out:
>>> return NULL;
>>> }
>>>
>>> -/* FIXME: validate args->cbs_{sequence,slot}id */
>>> /* FIXME: referring calls should be processed */
>>> unsigned nfs4_callback_sequence(struct cb_sequenceargs *args,
>>> struct cb_sequenceres *res)
>>> {
>>> - int i;
>>> - unsigned status = 0;
>>> + struct nfs_client *clp;
>>> + int i, status;
>>>
>>> for (i = 0; i < args->csa_nrclists; i++)
>>> kfree(args->csa_rclists[i].rcl_refcalls);
>>> kfree(args->csa_rclists);
>>>
>>> + status = NFS4ERR_BADSESSION;
>>> + clp = find_client_with_session(args->csa_addr, 4, &args->csa_sessionid);
>>> + if (clp == NULL)
>>> + goto out;
>>> +
>>> + status = validate_seqid(&clp->cl_session->bc_slot_table,
>>> + args->csa_slotid, args->csa_sequenceid);
>>> + if (status)
>>> + goto out_putclient;
>>> +
>>> memcpy(&res->csr_sessionid, &args->csa_sessionid,
>>> sizeof(res->csr_sessionid));
>>> res->csr_sequenceid = args->csa_sequenceid;
>>> @@ -159,9 +219,12 @@ unsigned nfs4_callback_sequence(struct cb_sequenceargs
>>> *args,
>>> res->csr_highestslotid = NFS41_BC_MAX_CALLBACKS - 1;
>>> res->csr_target_highestslotid = NFS41_BC_MAX_CALLBACKS - 1;
>>>
>>> - dprintk("%s: exit with status = %d\n", __func__, ntohl(status));
>>> - res->csr_status = status;
>>> - return status;
>>> +out_putclient:
>>> + nfs_put_client(clp);
>>> +out:
>>> + dprintk("%s: exit with status = %d\n", __func__, status);
>>> + res->csr_status = htonl(status);
>>> + return res->csr_status;
>>> }
>>>
>>> #endif /* CONFIG_NFS_V4_1 */
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
