Trond Myklebust wrote: > It boils down to this: I'm extremely reluctant to get into an arms race > of adding ever more mount options for increasingly finer-tuned attribute > cache timeouts. While such an option may meet _your_ machine room > requirements here and now, it becomes tiresome over the years as > machines gain power, and people first start lobbying for millisecond > timeouts, then microseconds, nanoseconds, pico... in order to catch up. > It only makes sense to make machines more powerful and put that power to optimum use. If keeping up with increased resolution is an issue, you think something like "-o unit=ms acregmin=..." would be better? 'unit' can apply to all the time related options defaulting to seconds. AG -- May the source be with you. http://cis.ksu.edu/~gud -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
