On Jun 3, 2009, at 3:52 PM, Jeff Layton wrote:
nfssvc_setfds checks to see if knfsd is already running. Move this
check to a helper function. Eventually the nfsd code will call this
directly.
Some of this isn't your fault, but this code could use a little extra
clean up as you split it up, IMO.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
support/nfs/nfssvc.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+-------------
1 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/support/nfs/nfssvc.c b/support/nfs/nfssvc.c
index 3e6bd31..8b15c4d 100644
--- a/support/nfs/nfssvc.c
+++ b/support/nfs/nfssvc.c
@@ -24,28 +24,46 @@
#define NFSD_VERS_FILE "/proc/fs/nfsd/versions"
#define NFSD_THREAD_FILE "/proc/fs/nfsd/threads"
-static void
-nfssvc_setfds(int port, unsigned int ctlbits, char *haddr)
+/*
+ * Are there already sockets configured? If not, then it is safe to
try to
+ * open some and pass them through.
+ *
+ * Note: If the user explicitly asked for 'udp', then we should
probably check
+ * if that is open, and should open it if not. However we don't
yet. All
+ * sockets have to be opened when the first daemon is started.
+ */
+int
+nfssvc_inuse(void)
{
- int fd, n, on=1;
+ int fd, n;
read(2) returns a ssize_t result, not an int.
char buf[BUFSIZ];
Eesh. BUFSIZ looks like it's two pages on my system, so adding this
helper makes the stack requirements in this path over 16KB.
Might be better if we used something a little more stack friendly
here. The kernel bounds the size of the read(2) result to
SIMPLE_TRANSACTION_LIMIT, which is less than a page, for example.
Making it a static would keep "buf" off the stack, too; or checking
how much buffer we really need (like only a few bytes, for this
particular check) might be better.
- int udpfd = -1, tcpfd = -1;
- struct sockaddr_in sin;
fd = open(NFSD_PORTS_FILE, O_RDONLY);
+
+ /* problem opening file, assume that nothing is configured */
if (fd < 0)
- return;
+ return 0;
+
n = read(fd, buf, BUFSIZ);
Nit: Using "sizeof(buf)" might be slightly more maintainable than
"BUFSIZ".
close(fd);
+
if (n != 0)
If read(2) returns -1, we return 1 here. How about "return (n > 0);" ?
+ return 1;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void
+nfssvc_setfds(int port, unsigned int ctlbits, char *haddr)
+{
+ int fd, n, on=1;
Another compiler warning issue: "n" is probably now unused in
nfssvc_setfds().
+ char buf[BUFSIZ];
+ int udpfd = -1, tcpfd = -1;
+ struct sockaddr_in sin;
+
+ if (nfssvc_inuse())
return;
- /* there are no ports currently open, so it is safe to
- * try to open some and pass them through.
- * Note: If the user explicitly asked for 'udp', then
- * we should probably check if that is open, and should
- * open it if not. However we don't yet. All sockets
- * have to be opened when the first daemon is started.
- */
+
fd = open(NFSD_PORTS_FILE, O_WRONLY);
if (fd < 0)
return;
--
1.6.2.2
--
Chuck Lever
chuck[dot]lever[at]oracle[dot]com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html