Re: [PATCH 05/10] nfs-utils: move check for active knfsd to helper function

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Jun 3, 2009, at 3:52 PM, Jeff Layton wrote:

nfssvc_setfds checks to see if knfsd is already running. Move this
check to a helper function. Eventually the nfsd code will call this
directly.

Some of this isn't your fault, but this code could use a little extra clean up as you split it up, IMO.

Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
support/nfs/nfssvc.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ +-------------
1 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/support/nfs/nfssvc.c b/support/nfs/nfssvc.c
index 3e6bd31..8b15c4d 100644
--- a/support/nfs/nfssvc.c
+++ b/support/nfs/nfssvc.c
@@ -24,28 +24,46 @@
#define NFSD_VERS_FILE    "/proc/fs/nfsd/versions"
#define NFSD_THREAD_FILE  "/proc/fs/nfsd/threads"

-static void
-nfssvc_setfds(int port, unsigned int ctlbits, char *haddr)
+/*
+ * Are there already sockets configured? If not, then it is safe to try to
+ * open some and pass them through.
+ *
+ * Note: If the user explicitly asked for 'udp', then we should probably check + * if that is open, and should open it if not. However we don't yet. All
+ * sockets have to be opened when the first daemon is started.
+ */
+int
+nfssvc_inuse(void)
{
-	int fd, n, on=1;
+	int fd, n;

read(2) returns a ssize_t result, not an int.

	char buf[BUFSIZ];

Eesh. BUFSIZ looks like it's two pages on my system, so adding this helper makes the stack requirements in this path over 16KB.

Might be better if we used something a little more stack friendly here. The kernel bounds the size of the read(2) result to SIMPLE_TRANSACTION_LIMIT, which is less than a page, for example. Making it a static would keep "buf" off the stack, too; or checking how much buffer we really need (like only a few bytes, for this particular check) might be better.

-	int udpfd = -1, tcpfd = -1;
-	struct sockaddr_in sin;

	fd = open(NFSD_PORTS_FILE, O_RDONLY);
+
+	/* problem opening file, assume that nothing is configured */
	if (fd < 0)
-		return;
+		return 0;
+
	n = read(fd, buf, BUFSIZ);

Nit: Using "sizeof(buf)" might be slightly more maintainable than "BUFSIZ".

	close(fd);
+
	if (n != 0)

If read(2) returns -1, we return 1 here.  How about "return (n > 0);" ?

+		return 1;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static void
+nfssvc_setfds(int port, unsigned int ctlbits, char *haddr)
+{
+	int fd, n, on=1;

Another compiler warning issue: "n" is probably now unused in nfssvc_setfds().


+	char buf[BUFSIZ];
+	int udpfd = -1, tcpfd = -1;
+	struct sockaddr_in sin;
+
+	if (nfssvc_inuse())
		return;
-	/* there are no ports currently open, so it is safe to
-	 * try to open some and pass them through.
-	 * Note: If the user explicitly asked for 'udp', then
-	 * we should probably check if that is open, and should
-	 * open it if not.  However we don't yet.  All sockets
-	 * have to be opened when the first daemon is started.
-	 */
+
	fd = open(NFSD_PORTS_FILE, O_WRONLY);
	if (fd < 0)
		return;
--
1.6.2.2


--
Chuck Lever
chuck[dot]lever[at]oracle[dot]com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux