Since I'm just getting around to this now... just replace this patch please.... tia, steved Kevin Coffman wrote: > On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 5:24 PM, J. Bruce Fields <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 05:56:26PM -0400, Kevin Coffman wrote: >>> From: Olga Kornievskaia <aglo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> Add support for handling upcalls on the new "nfsd4_cb" directory pipes. >>> Only new kernels (2.6.29) have support for this new pipe directory. >>> (The need for this new pipe directory will go away with NFSv4.1 where >>> the callback can be done on the same connection as the fore-channel.) >> My only complaint is that the code would be robust (and more >> future-proof) if instead of specifically looking for "nfs" and >> "nfsd4_cb", we just look at all top-level rpc_pipefs directories and >> handed directories under any of them in the same way. >> >> --b. > > In our offline discussion, Bruce convinced me that we should just > treat all the directories under the rpc_pipefs directory as equal, and > process any clnt directories that show up within them. (This > currently includes, "lockd mount nfs nfsd4_cb portmap statd".) > Any new directories appearing in the future will automatically get the > same treatment. > > Steve, I don't know what you might have already done with these > patches. Would you prefer a replacement for this patch, or patch on > top of this? > > K.C. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
