On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 12:42:52PM -0400, andros@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Andy Adamson <andros@xxxxxxxxxx>
This should probably be folded into the last patch.
(For one reason: looks like applying everything up to the last patch
would result in a kernel that leaked memory, since these things never
got freed? The rule here is that applying patches 1...n of any patch
series should never introduce any new problems.)
--b.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Adamson <andros@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> index 9e79e0c..787cffe 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> @@ -590,7 +590,7 @@ free_session(struct kref *kref)
> ses = container_of(kref, struct nfsd4_session, se_ref);
> for (i = 0; i < ses->se_fchannel.maxreqs; i++) {
> struct nfsd4_cache_entry *e = &ses->se_slots[i].sl_cache_entry;
> - nfsd4_release_respages(e->ce_respages, e->ce_resused);
> + kfree(e->ce_datav.iov_base);
> }
> kfree(ses);
> }
> --
> 1.5.4.3
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
