On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 03:51:38AM +0300, Benny Halevy wrote: > On Apr. 03, 2009, 3:45 +0300, Benny Halevy <bhalevy@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Apr. 03, 2009, 1:33 +0300, Benny Halevy <bhalevy@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Bruce, > >> > >> The following patches fix non-DRC review comments. > >> They are untested yet, but I wanted to send them out ASAP > > > > Passed cthon tests over nfs4 so far from several clients: > > same kernel, nfs41-for-2.6.30 from today, and from 2.6.27.19-78.2.30.fc9.x86_64. > > The latter hit a single unreproducible failure in the bigfile test. > > > > No pynfs regressions. > > Oh, and I forgot to mention that I saw these suspicious messages > on /var/log/messages a while after my last cthon test finished and the > test server was essentially idle: > > Apr 3 03:19:05 tl1 kernel: nfsd: non-standard errno: -9 > Apr 3 03:25:52 tl1 kernel: nfsd: inode locked twice during operation. > Apr 3 03:25:54 tl1 kernel: RPC: multiple fragments per record not supported > > I'm not what caused them and if they show up with the nfsd41 patches > or not. The last two look normal for pynfs runs. The first I don't recall seeing before. Hm, -9 is EBADF. I'd be curious where that's coming from. Probably it's nothing serious--pynfs does weird stuff. --b. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
