On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 11:31:09AM +0300, Benny Halevy wrote: > Added CONFIG_NFSD_V4_1 and made it depend upon NFSD_V4 and EXPERIMENTAL > Indicate that CONFIG_NFS_V4_1 is for NFS developers at the moment Stupid question: do we need CONFIG_NFSD_V4_1 at all? How many people will want to build a kernel with v4.0 but not v4.1? (And: do we have an interface that allows turning off 4.1 at run-time? That's more important than the config option.) --b. > > At the moment we're expecting folks trying out nfs41 to > actively participate in the development process by helping us > debug issues and ideally send patches to fix problems. > > [trailing space fixed] > Signed-off-by: Benny Halevy <bhalevy@xxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > fs/nfsd/Kconfig | 9 +++++++++ > 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/nfsd/Kconfig b/fs/nfsd/Kconfig > index 503b9da..1f2f893 100644 > --- a/fs/nfsd/Kconfig > +++ b/fs/nfsd/Kconfig > @@ -79,3 +79,12 @@ config NFSD_V4 > available from http://linux-nfs.org/. > > If unsure, say N. > + > +config NFSD_V4_1 > + bool "NFS server support for NFSv4.1 (DEVELOPER ONLY)" > + depends on NFSD_V4 && EXPERIMENTAL > + help > + This option enables support for minor version 1 of the NFSv4 protocol > + (draft-ietf-nfsv4-minorversion1) in the kernel's NFS server. > + > + Unless you're an NFS developer, say N. > -- > 1.6.2.1 > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
