Re: NFS4 ACL <-> Posix ACL

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2009/3/24, Greg Banks <gnb@xxxxxxx>:
> Alex Bremer wrote:
>> [...]
>>  Would the inheritance work if we
>> used a fully NFS4-ACL compatible filesystem? Is there any for Linux?
>>
>
> There are patches to make ext3 and XFS natively NFSv4 ACL aware.  The
> XFS patches have been shipping in an SGI product for some months now.
>
> http://oss.sgi.com/projects/nfs/nfs4acl/
>

Thanks for that link. I will have a closer look at it.

But if I understood J. Bruce Fields correctly an NFS4-ACL compliant
filesystem wouldn't fix the inheritance problem, too because either
the server has to know the umask or the client has to lookup the
directory ACLs. So there would be no real advantage of using NFS4-ACLs
- most things can be done with PosixACLs.

I really begin to hate these umask settings. From my point of view
these settings should only be used as a last resort fallback.
Filesystem inheritance ACLs should always have precedence.

Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux