nfsd4_lockt does a search for a lockstateowner when building the lock struct to test. If one is found, it'll set fl_owner to it. Regardless of whether that happens, it'll also set fl_lmops. Given that this lock is basically a "lightweight" lock that's just used for checking conflicts, setting fl_lmops is probably not appropriate for it. This behavior exposed a bug in DLM's GETLK implementation where it wasn't clearing out the fields in the file_lock before filling in conflicting lock info. While we were able to fix this in DLM, it still seems pointless and dangerous to set the fl_lmops this way when we may have a NULL lockstateowner. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx> --- fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 1 - 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c index 88db7d3..b6f60f4 100644 --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c @@ -2871,7 +2871,6 @@ nfsd4_lockt(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate, file_lock.fl_owner = (fl_owner_t)lockt->lt_stateowner; file_lock.fl_pid = current->tgid; file_lock.fl_flags = FL_POSIX; - file_lock.fl_lmops = &nfsd_posix_mng_ops; file_lock.fl_start = lockt->lt_offset; file_lock.fl_end = last_byte_offset(lockt->lt_offset, lockt->lt_length); -- 1.5.5.6 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
