On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 09:27:30AM -0500, Jeff Moyer wrote: > Greg Banks <gnb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > Steve Dickson wrote: > >> So the ultimate goal would be to replace all the dprintks with trace points > >> but still be able to enable them through the rpcdebug command > > I have a patch which changes the definition of the dprintk() macro (but > > *not* dprintk() callsites) to allow enabling and disabling individual > > dprintk() statements through a /proc/ interface. Would you be > > interested in that? > > That sounds like duplicated work. How does it differ from Jason Baron's > dynamic printk patches (which I believe are now upstream)? > > Cheers, > Jeff Introducing/converting one of the accepted methods of static instrumentation - like tracepoints would help more users (whether in-kernel or otherwise) harness them. Steve, Would it help convert the systemtap script (nfs_mount.stp) in Patch - 5 into a kernel module (perhaps in samples/ directory) to bring an in-kernel user of these tracepoints? Thanks, K.Prasad -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
