On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 19:20 -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > If it would be possible, for example, for the 'init' namespace to have > no network interfaces at all, then it would be nicer to use a name > that's at least been used with nfs at *some* point--just on the general > principle of not leaking information to a domain that the user wouldn't > expect it to. Then RPC would fail. Thanks to the limitations imposed by selinux & friends, all RPC sockets have to be owned by the init process. -- Trond Myklebust Linux NFS client maintainer NetApp Trond.Myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx www.netapp.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
