Re: [PATCH 1/3] SUNRPC: Ensure the server closes sockets in a timely fashion

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Trond Myklebust wrote:
We want to ensure that connected sockets close down the connection when we
set XPT_CLOSE, so that we don't keep it hanging while cleaning up all the
stuff that is keeping a reference to the socket.

Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx>
---

 net/sunrpc/svcsock.c |   21 ++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)


diff --git a/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c b/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
index 95293f5..a1b048d 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
@@ -59,6 +59,7 @@ static void		svc_udp_data_ready(struct sock *, int);
 static int		svc_udp_recvfrom(struct svc_rqst *);
 static int		svc_udp_sendto(struct svc_rqst *);
 static void		svc_sock_detach(struct svc_xprt *);
+static void		svc_tcp_sock_detach(struct svc_xprt *);
 static void		svc_sock_free(struct svc_xprt *);
static struct svc_xprt *svc_create_socket(struct svc_serv *, int,
@@ -1017,7 +1018,7 @@ static struct svc_xprt_ops svc_tcp_ops = {
 	.xpo_recvfrom = svc_tcp_recvfrom,
 	.xpo_sendto = svc_tcp_sendto,
 	.xpo_release_rqst = svc_release_skb,
-	.xpo_detach = svc_sock_detach,
+	.xpo_detach = svc_tcp_sock_detach,
 	.xpo_free = svc_sock_free,
 	.xpo_prep_reply_hdr = svc_tcp_prep_reply_hdr,
 	.xpo_has_wspace = svc_tcp_has_wspace,
@@ -1282,6 +1283,24 @@ static void svc_sock_detach(struct svc_xprt *xprt)
 	sk->sk_state_change = svsk->sk_ostate;
 	sk->sk_data_ready = svsk->sk_odata;
 	sk->sk_write_space = svsk->sk_owspace;
+
+	if (sk->sk_sleep && waitqueue_active(sk->sk_sleep))
+		wake_up_interruptible(sk->sk_sleep);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Disconnect the socket, and reset the callbacks
+ */
+static void svc_tcp_sock_detach(struct svc_xprt *xprt)
+{
+	struct svc_sock *svsk = container_of(xprt, struct svc_sock, sk_xprt);
+
+	dprintk("svc: svc_tcp_sock_detach(%p)\n", svsk);
+
+	svc_sock_detach(xprt);
+
+	if (!test_bit(XPT_LISTENER, &xprt->xpt_flags))
+		kernel_sock_shutdown(svsk->sk_sock, SHUT_RDWR);

How is this different than what happens as an artifact of sock_release?

 }
/*


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux