On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 08:43:52PM +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > On Tue, 2008-12-16 at 12:39 -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > > More precisely, it looks like this started with > > > > bde74e4bc64415b142e "locks: add special return value for > > asynchronous locks" > > > > But I haven't had the chance to look any harder yet. Miklos? Is this > > easy for you to reproduce? > > Not immediately, at the moment I don't have NFS set up. But if you > don't beat me to it, I'll look into this. OK, thanks. I'll take another look too when I get the chance, so let me know of any partial result. It may just for example be returning the wrong error to the client on an nlm blocking lock request, so that the client assumes the lock is gone and goes away rather than waiting for a grant request. --b. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
