On Tue, 04 Nov 2008 14:26:21 -0500 Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 13:42 -0500, Jeff Layton wrote: > > While we're on the subject of signals... > > > > Do you have any thoughts/objections to just making the reclaimer thread > > ignore them altogether? That would simplify the code a bit. > > How does the administrator then get out of the situation where the > server dies (permanently) in the middle of a reclaim? > Erm...Reboot? :) Ok, I'm convinced. I suppose that's a good enough argument for continuing to allow SIGKILL. I guess the only change we need to make to this patch for now is to remove the "memory leak" comment (unless there is a leak and I'm just not seeing it). -- Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html