From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
The fattrs used in the NFSv3 getacl/setacl calls are not being properly
initialized. This occasionally causes nfs_update_inode to fall into
NFSv4 specific codepaths when handling post-op attrs from these calls.
Thanks to Cai Qian for noticing the spurious NFSv4 messages in debug
output from a v3 mount...
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/nfs/nfs3acl.c | 2 ++
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs3acl.c b/fs/nfs/nfs3acl.c
index 423842f..cef6255 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/nfs3acl.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs3acl.c
@@ -229,6 +229,7 @@ struct posix_acl *nfs3_proc_getacl(struct inode *inode, int type)
dprintk("NFS call getacl\n");
msg.rpc_proc = &server->client_acl->cl_procinfo[ACLPROC3_GETACL];
+ nfs_fattr_init(&fattr);
status = rpc_call_sync(server->client_acl, &msg, 0);
dprintk("NFS reply getacl: %d\n", status);
@@ -322,6 +323,7 @@ static int nfs3_proc_setacls(struct inode *inode, struct posix_acl *acl,
dprintk("NFS call setacl\n");
msg.rpc_proc = &server->client_acl->cl_procinfo[ACLPROC3_SETACL];
+ nfs_fattr_init(&fattr);
status = rpc_call_sync(server->client_acl, &msg, 0);
nfs_access_zap_cache(inode);
nfs_zap_acl_cache(inode);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
