Re: [PATCH 06/10] lockd: Add helper to sanity check incoming NOTIFY requests

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sep 26, 2008, at Sep 26, 2008, 6:43 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 11:17:57AM -0500, Chuck Lever wrote:
The NLM performs a silly test to see that incoming NOTIFY requests are relatively secure. Make sure the test works for both AF_INET and AF_INET6
addresses.

Makes sense.  (Why's the test silly?  If it prevents local users from
telling lockd to drop a client's locks, that seems good.)

I was referring to the port range part of the test. Anyone who wants real security will not rely on the port value, but will use SSL or third-party authentication like Kerberos.



--b.


Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx>
---

fs/lockd/svc4proc.c         |    6 ++----
fs/lockd/svcproc.c          |    6 ++----
include/linux/lockd/lockd.h | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ++++++++
3 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/lockd/svc4proc.c b/fs/lockd/svc4proc.c
index 9e1c751..6a5ef9f 100644
--- a/fs/lockd/svc4proc.c
+++ b/fs/lockd/svc4proc.c
@@ -432,11 +432,9 @@ nlm4svc_proc_sm_notify(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nlm_reboot *argp,
{
	struct sockaddr_in	saddr;

-	memcpy(&saddr, svc_addr_in(rqstp), sizeof(saddr));
-
	dprintk("lockd: SM_NOTIFY     called\n");
-	if (saddr.sin_addr.s_addr != htonl(INADDR_LOOPBACK)
-	 || ntohs(saddr.sin_port) >= 1024) {
+
+	if (!nlm_privileged_requester(rqstp)) {
		char buf[RPC_MAX_ADDRBUFLEN];
		printk(KERN_WARNING "lockd: rejected NSM callback from %s\n",
				svc_print_addr(rqstp, buf, sizeof(buf)));
diff --git a/fs/lockd/svcproc.c b/fs/lockd/svcproc.c
index fcb7998..62fcfdb 100644
--- a/fs/lockd/svcproc.c
+++ b/fs/lockd/svcproc.c
@@ -464,11 +464,9 @@ nlmsvc_proc_sm_notify(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nlm_reboot *argp,
{
	struct sockaddr_in	saddr;

-	memcpy(&saddr, svc_addr_in(rqstp), sizeof(saddr));
-
	dprintk("lockd: SM_NOTIFY     called\n");
-	if (saddr.sin_addr.s_addr != htonl(INADDR_LOOPBACK)
-	 || ntohs(saddr.sin_port) >= 1024) {
+
+	if (!nlm_privileged_requester(rqstp)) {
		char buf[RPC_MAX_ADDRBUFLEN];
		printk(KERN_WARNING "lockd: rejected NSM callback from %s\n",
				svc_print_addr(rqstp, buf, sizeof(buf)));
diff --git a/include/linux/lockd/lockd.h b/include/linux/lockd/ lockd.h
index 075095f..409eab4 100644
--- a/include/linux/lockd/lockd.h
+++ b/include/linux/lockd/lockd.h
@@ -280,6 +280,47 @@ static inline struct inode *nlmsvc_file_inode(struct nlm_file *file)
	return file->f_file->f_path.dentry->d_inode;
}

+static inline int __nlm_privileged_request4(const struct sockaddr *sap)
+{
+	const struct sockaddr_in *sin = (struct sockaddr_in *)sap;
+	return (sin->sin_addr.s_addr == htonl(INADDR_LOOPBACK)) &&
+			(ntohs(sin->sin_port) < 1024);
+}
+
+#if defined(CONFIG_IPV6) || defined(CONFIG_IPV6_MODULE)
+static inline int __nlm_privileged_request6(const struct sockaddr *sap)
+{
+	const struct sockaddr_in6 *sin6 = (struct sockaddr_in6 *)sap;
+	return (ipv6_addr_type(&sin6->sin6_addr) & IPV6_ADDR_LOOPBACK) &&
+			(ntohs(sin6->sin6_port) < 1024);
+}
+#else	/* defined(CONFIG_IPV6) || defined(CONFIG_IPV6_MODULE) */
+static inline int __nlm_privileged_request6(const struct sockaddr *sap)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+#endif	/* defined(CONFIG_IPV6) || defined(CONFIG_IPV6_MODULE) */
+
+/*
+ * Ensure incoming requests are suitably "secure"
+ *
+ * Return TRUE if sender is local and is connecting via a privileged port;
+ * otherwise return FALSE.
+ */
+static inline int nlm_privileged_requester(const struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
+{
+	const struct sockaddr *sap = svc_addr(rqstp);
+
+	switch (sap->sa_family) {
+	case AF_INET:
+		return __nlm_privileged_request4(sap);
+	case AF_INET6:
+		return __nlm_privileged_request6(sap);
+	default:
+		return 0;
+	}
+}
+
static inline int __nlm_cmp_addr4(const struct sockaddr *sap1,
				  const struct sockaddr *sap2)
{

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--
Chuck Lever
chuck[dot]lever[at]oracle[dot]com




--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux