The fattrs used in the NFSv3 getacl/setacl calls are not being properly initialized. This occasionally causes nfs_update_inode to fall into NFSv4 specific codepaths when handling post-op attrs from these calls. Thanks to Cai Qian for noticing the spurious NFSv4 messages in debug output from a v3 mount... Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx> --- fs/nfs/nfs3acl.c | 2 ++ 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs3acl.c b/fs/nfs/nfs3acl.c index 423842f..cef6255 100644 --- a/fs/nfs/nfs3acl.c +++ b/fs/nfs/nfs3acl.c @@ -229,6 +229,7 @@ struct posix_acl *nfs3_proc_getacl(struct inode *inode, int type) dprintk("NFS call getacl\n"); msg.rpc_proc = &server->client_acl->cl_procinfo[ACLPROC3_GETACL]; + nfs_fattr_init(&fattr); status = rpc_call_sync(server->client_acl, &msg, 0); dprintk("NFS reply getacl: %d\n", status); @@ -322,6 +323,7 @@ static int nfs3_proc_setacls(struct inode *inode, struct posix_acl *acl, dprintk("NFS call setacl\n"); msg.rpc_proc = &server->client_acl->cl_procinfo[ACLPROC3_SETACL]; + nfs_fattr_init(&fattr); status = rpc_call_sync(server->client_acl, &msg, 0); nfs_access_zap_cache(inode); nfs_zap_acl_cache(inode); -- 1.5.5.1 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html