Re: [pnfs] [PATCH 0/2] fix nfsd stateid encoding

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 12:17:35PM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
> Hi Benny-
> 
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 12:11 PM, Benny Halevy <bhalevy@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Aug. 11, 2008, 18:58 +0300, "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 05:09:36PM +0300, Benny Halevy wrote:
> >>> Bruce, in a couple locations the nfsd needs to encode the stateid.seqid
> >>> as a uint32_t rather than as opaque.
> >>
> >> Agreed, thanks.
> >>
> >> Though I have a hard time figuring out whether this has any impact in
> >> practice.  Presumably the only change on the wire is that we'll get the
> >> endianness of the stateid4.seqid right?  But that field is mostly opaque
> >> to the client anyway; 3530 says
> >>
> >>       The server is required to increment the seqid field
> >>       monotonically at each transition of the stateid.  This is
> >>       important since the client will inspect the seqid in OPEN
> >>       stateids to determine the order of OPEN processing done by the
> >>       server.
> >>
> >> but doesn't say why this is important.  I'm sure this has been brought
> >> up on the ietf list before, but can't recall whether someone came up
> >> with a justification for the importance of this.
> >>
> >> Anyway, so I figure these should be queued up for the next (2.6.28)
> >> merge window.  Thanks!
> >
> > Actually, I think this breaks delegreturn.
> > Since we decode the stateid.si_generation correctly, it will get swabbed
> > in delegreturn on little-endian servers.  This will cause
> > nfs4_preprocess_stateid_op/check_stateid_generation as called by
> > nfsd4_delegreturn to fail. And eventually, unhash_delegation
> > wouldn't be called.
> 
> Sounds plausible, good catch.  Yet another reason we should have an
> easy-to-access delegation counter metric on both the client and
> server.
> 
> I wonder, since you found three separate places where this is needed:
> should you construct a helper function?

A stateid encoder/decoder?  Sure, that could be a good idea.

--b.

> Certainly there are already
> missed opportunities for sharing XDR encoding and decoding between
> callback and the forward channel.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux