J. Bruce Fields wrote: > On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 04:42:54PM +1000, Greg Banks wrote: > >> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.nfs/10372 >> >> > > Looks like that was me, apologies. Breaking a documented interface to > userspace just set off an alarm. But if we really convince ourselves > that it's useless, then OK. > I think I explained last time how useless it is. > (Though maybe your idea of leaving the line in place with just constant > zeros is good. Just because the data's useless doesn't mean someone out > there may have a script that does otherwise useful things but that > happens to fail if it can't parse /proc/net/rpc/nfsd.) > Ok, I'm happy to do it that way. > Looks like it's been two years now--any chance of rebasing those patches > and resending? > Yep. -- Greg Banks, P.Engineer, SGI Australian Software Group. The cake is *not* a lie. I don't speak for SGI. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
