At 01:24 PM 6/9/2008, Jeff Layton wrote: > >"Be sure to wait for X minutes between failovers" At least one grace period. > >...wouldn't instill me with a lot of confidence. We'd have to have >some sort of mechanism to enforce this, and that would be less than >ideal. > >IMO, the ideal thing would be to make sure that the "old" server is >ready to pick up the service again as soon as possible after the service >leaves it. A great goal, but it seems to me you've bundled a lot of other incompatible requirements along with it. Having some services restart and not others, for example. And mixing transparent IP address takeover with stateful recovery such as TCP reconnect and NSM/NLM. NSM provides only notification, there's no way for either server to know for sure all the clients have completed either switch-to or switch-back. Of course, you could switch to UDP-only, that would fix the TCP issue. But it won't fix NSM/NLM. Tom. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
