On Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 07:47:35AM -0400, Peter Staubach wrote: > The bottom line is that 1) I don't think that the NFSv4 > implementation from NetApp is as bad as feared and 2) that > using NFSv3 with krb5 should be as secure as NFSv4 with krb5. That's true for the protocol itself, though depending on the threat you're worried about, the fact that NFSv4 allows the equivalent of mount calls to be done with krb5 security (and thus thwarts spoofing of the replies) may be an advantage for NFSv4. --b. > Give either or both a shot. I think that you will be pleasantly > surprised. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
