This being an accepted practice -- as opposed to a clearly
defined requirement in a spec someplace ??
On May 21, 2008, at 7:38 AM, Peter Staubach wrote:
Talpey, Thomas wrote:
At 08:14 AM 5/21/2008, Peter Staubach wrote:
I have seen servers which didn't implement the NULL_PROC procedure
for protocols like NFS_ACL. Beats me why.
Names. We want names. :-)
:-)
Names withheld to prevent embarrassment of the guilty?
Actually, I don't remember anymore who they were, but I suspect
that I would have complained to them at the time. It just isn't
that hard to implement a procedure which doesn't do anything but
respond to the client.
ps
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs"
in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
