Re: [NFS] async vs. sync. corrupted fs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



At 04:00 AM 5/20/2008, Chris Fanning wrote:
>However it does show up in /proc/mounts
>nfs_home_server:/home /home nfs
>rw,vers=3,rsize=32768,wsize=23768,hard,nointr,proto=tcp,timeo=600,retr
>ans=2,sec=sys,addr=192.168.2.2
>0 0

Is that a transcription typo - "23768"?

As Trond mentioned though - NFS can't cause server corruption.
If server "async" changes this, there's a deeper root cause.

Tom.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft 
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. 
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist  -  NFS@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs
_______________________________________________
Please note that nfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx is being discontinued.
Please subscribe to linux-nfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx instead.
    http://vger.kernel.org/vger-lists.html#linux-nfs

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux