On Friday May 9, bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Um, sorry about that subject line.
I liked it ;-) Gave a bit of an informal feel....
>
> On Fri, May 09, 2008 at 03:23:19PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > From: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Commit f15364bd4cf8799a7677b6daeed7b67d9139d974 ("IPv6 support for NFS
> > server export caches") dropped a couple spaces, rendering the output
> > here difficult to read.
> >
> > (However note that we expect the output to be parsed only by humans, not
> > machines, so this shouldn't have broken any userland software.)
> >
> > Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Aurelien Charbon <aurelien.charbon@xxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Brian Haley <brian.haley@xxxxxx>
> > Cc: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / $(O$h掩 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > ---
> > net/sunrpc/svcauth_unix.c | 4 ++--
> > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > I just noticed this while doing some debugging at Connectathon. I'm
> > undecided whether to take it seriously. Does anyone other than me use
> > these /content files? I suppose it should probably go into 2.6.26 but
> > not 2.6.25.x.
I don't think any code uses them, but it's very good to be able to
look at them when something doesn't seem to be working as expected.
But I don't think the patch would apply to 2.6.25. 'git name-rev' on
the offending commit say:
f15364bd4cf8799a7677b6daeed7b67d9139d974 tags/v2.6.26-rc1~1083^2~47
which means it was in 2.6.26-rc1 but not the previous release.
NeilBrown
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
