Re: [PATCH 2/17] svcrdma: Fix race with dto_tasklet in svc_rdma_send

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 5/6/08 4:18 PM, "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 09:26:02PM -0500, Tom Tucker wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 5/5/08 5:06 PM, "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> 
>>> On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 11:28:34AM -0500, Tom Tucker wrote:
>>>> The svc_rdma_send function will attempt to reap SQ WR to make room for
>>>> a new request if it finds the SQ full. This function races with the
>>>> dto_tasklet that also reaps SQ WR. To avoid calling the function
>>>> unnecessarily use test_and_clear_bit with the RDMAXPRT_SQ_PENDING
>>>> flag to serialize access to the sq_cq_reap function.
>>> 
>>> OK.  I won't pretend to understand much of this, but--would it be worth
>>> pulling out the added code here into a helper function, since it now
>>> exists in two different places?  (Especially if correctness depends on
>>> the same thing happening in both the places this bit can be cleared.)
>> 
>> Yes. Good suggestions.
>> 
>> BTW, this code is here because the SQ is undersized for big data. Since a
>> single NFS_READ/WRITE can result in an attempt to fetch a large amount of
>> data from the client (2M) and depending on certain HW resources this can
>> result in a lot of WR being posted to the SQ.
> 
> WR is write request, SQ is send queue?  (In which case this happens on
> nfs read operations?)  I'm behind....
> 
>> That said, there is a change coming in the 2.6.27 time frame that supports
>> what is called Fast NSMR register. This allows the transport to effectively
>> DMA map the entire transfer size (32k -- 2M) all as a single SGE. This will
>> take a lot of pressure off the SQ and effectively make this code
>> unnecessary.
> 
> OK!
> 
> Ideally we'd have patches for 2.6.27 in linux-next for a little while
> first, so we should try to have that ready in a month or so, when the
> -rc's start looking final.

It may be .28 then.  A lot of pieces have to come together...

> 
> --b.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux