On Tue, 2008-04-29 at 17:57 -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > Current lockd code appears to reject regular locks done during the grace > period, but not reclaims that come outside of the grace period. > > (That's based on inspecting the code--I haven't run tests.) > > That seems like an obvious bug. (We're not giving the client any way to > determine whether conflicting locks might have been granted.) > > Can we fix it, or is there a chance that people have been depending on > this behavior? (Maybe for failing over to an already-active server??) Sorry, but I really don't care if anyone has been relying on it: that is a _major_ bug and needs to be fixed ASAP. Trond -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
