On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 4:32 PM, J. Bruce Fields <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Sorry, not very clear. Perhaps statd should bind to the loopback > > interface in addition to any other interfaces if it doesn't bind > > to INADDR_ANY. > > Right, that's what would make the most sense to me. Janne, is there any > reason that wouldn't solve your problem? I didn't get the idea. So the idea is to use multiple sockets, one bound to LOOPBACK and one to external interface? Complicated and unclean in my opinion: one address should suffice. -- // Janne -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
