Re: [patch] fix statd -n

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



J. Bruce Fields wrote:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 12:38:43PM -0400, Janne Karhunen wrote:
Apparently lockd does not expect statd to be used with -n
switch: statd is expected to bind loopback, always. Attached
patches show one (IPv4 specific) way of fixing it. Comments?

Maybe statd really should always bind to the loopback interface?  Is
there any reason not to?

This patch is very similar to what we had about one year ago for cluster lock failover... Maybe it is about time to revisit the issues ?

-- Wendy


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux