Re: [patch] fix statd -n

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 1:36 PM, J. Bruce Fields <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>  > Apparently lockd does not expect statd to be used with -n
>  > switch: statd is expected to bind loopback, always. Attached
>  > patches show one (IPv4 specific) way of fixing it. Comments?
>
>  Maybe statd really should always bind to the loopback interface?  Is
>  there any reason not to?

In my case I used -n to push NSM/NLM comms to
clusters specific NFS service address (that just
happens to migrate all around). -n is the only way
to do this: otherwise it will bind to INADDR_ANY
on node that has gazillion interfaces/addresses..

That, and the original reasoning for the option is
said in statd code:

        /*
         * If a local hostname is given (-n option to statd), bind to
the address
         * specified. This is required to support clients that ignore
the mon_name in
         * the statd protocol but use the source address from the
request packet.
         */


>  From a quick look at the current nfs-utils code: it looks like the -n
>  option only affects the operation of the sm-notify program that's called
>  on boot to notify peer statd's?  I'm a little confused.  (What version
>  of nfs-utils are you working from?)

Right. 1.0.8 -> 1.0.12, it's valid for all.


-- 
// Janne
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux