Re: [pnfs] [PATCH] nfs: call nfs4_try_open_cached only if opendata->state is not NULL

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Apr. 09, 2008, 19:40 +0300, Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-04-09 at 19:20 +0300, Benny Halevy wrote:
>> Fixes the following oops that happened after breaking from a pending
>> open with ^C.
>>
>> (traces below apply to the nfs41 development tree, not mainline kernel)
>>
>> Apr  9 19:00:19 bh-testlin1 kernel: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000038
>> Apr  9 19:00:19 bh-testlin1 kernel: IP: [<ffffffff8820732b>] :nfs:nfs4_opendata_to_nfs4_state+0x27/0x240
>> ...
>> Apr  9 19:00:19 bh-testlin1 kernel: Call Trace:
>> Apr  9 19:00:19 bh-testlin1 kernel:  [<ffffffff88207833>] :nfs:nfs4_do_open+0x14e/0x238
>> Apr  9 19:00:19 bh-testlin1 kernel:  [<ffffffff8820be3a>] :nfs:nfs4_atomic_open+0xd7/0x19d
>> Apr  9 19:00:19 bh-testlin1 kernel:  [<ffffffff8108e0a1>] init_object+0x27/0x6b
>> Apr  9 19:00:19 bh-testlin1 kernel:  [<ffffffff8108faf3>] __slab_alloc+0x3c5/0x44a
>> Apr  9 19:00:19 bh-testlin1 kernel:  [<ffffffff810a579a>] d_alloc+0x24/0x1af
>> Apr  9 19:00:19 bh-testlin1 kernel:  [<ffffffff881f3e3e>] :nfs:nfs_atomic_lookup+0xb5/0x109
>> Apr  9 19:00:19 bh-testlin1 kernel:  [<ffffffff8109c624>] __lookup_hash+0xe9/0x10d
>> Apr  9 19:00:19 bh-testlin1 kernel:  [<ffffffff8109f8c6>] open_namei+0xfe/0x675
>> Apr  9 19:00:19 bh-testlin1 kernel:  [<ffffffff8108e399>] check_bytes_and_report+0x37/0xc9
>> Apr  9 19:00:19 bh-testlin1 kernel:  [<ffffffff81093f5d>] do_filp_open+0x1c/0x38
>> Apr  9 19:00:19 bh-testlin1 kernel:  [<ffffffff8109d6f2>] getname+0x25/0x1a6
>> Apr  9 19:00:19 bh-testlin1 kernel:  [<ffffffff81093d3e>] get_unused_fd_flags+0x111/0x11f
>> Apr  9 19:00:19 bh-testlin1 kernel:  [<ffffffff81093fbf>] do_sys_open+0x46/0xc3
>> Apr  9 19:00:19 bh-testlin1 kernel:  [<ffffffff8100c0bd>] tracesys+0xdc/0xe1
>>
>> (gdb) list *(nfs4_opendata_to_nfs4_state+0x27)
>> 0x1832b is in nfs4_opendata_to_nfs4_state (fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c:806).
>> 801     }
>> 802
>> 803     static struct nfs4_state *nfs4_try_open_cached(struct nfs4_opendata *opendata)
>> 804     {
>> 805             struct nfs4_state *state = opendata->state;
>> 806             struct nfs_inode *nfsi = NFS_I(state->inode);
>> 807             struct nfs_delegation *delegation;
>> 808             int open_mode = opendata->o_arg.open_flags & (FMODE_READ|FMODE_WRITE|O_EXCL);
>> 809             nfs4_stateid stateid;
>> 810             int ret = -EAGAIN;
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Benny Halevy <bhalevy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c |    2 +-
>>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
>> index 7ce0786..d6a530f 100644
>> --- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
>> +++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
>> @@ -483,7 +483,7 @@ static struct nfs4_state *nfs4_opendata_to_nfs4_state(struct nfs4_opendata *data
>>  	nfs4_stateid *deleg_stateid = NULL;
>>  	int ret;
>>  
>> -	if (!data->rpc_done) {
>> +	if (!data->rpc_done && data->state) {
>>  		state = nfs4_try_open_cached(data);
>>  		goto out;
>>  	}
> 
> Wait. How are we getting in this state in the first place? If we're
> exiting without rpc_done being set, then that means either
> 
>       * the 'can_open_cached()' condition in nfs4_open_prepare()
>         triggered (in which case we _do_ have data->state set)
> or
>       * the user interrupted the RPC call before it completed, in which
>         case we should get an error from nfs4_proc_open, and never call
>         nfs4_opendata_to_nfs4_state()

Yes, the open call was interrupted.
IIRC, the nfs4_opendata_to_nfs4_state call happened on a subsequent
open, not the one that was interrupted.
I'll try to reproduce this and prove better analysis and hopefully a
better fix.

Benny

> 
> The only other case I see would be the one where RPC_ASSASSINATED()
> triggers in nfs4_open_done(); I suppose that might trigger the Oops. The
> fix in that case would be to ensure that we still set data->rpc_done.
> 
>   Trond
> 
> _______________________________________________
> pNFS mailing list
> pNFS@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://linux-nfs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pnfs

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux