Hi Stephen, On Wed, Feb 19, 2025 at 12:49:34AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 11:35:02 +0100 Beata Michalska <beata.michalska@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > I'm currently testing a proper fix for that one. > > Should I just send it over as a diff to apply or rather a proper 'fixes' patch? > > Maybe a proper 'fixes' patch, please, if easy - otherwise a diff is > fine. I just talked to Beata off-list. I think she'll try to use the current for_each_cpu_wrap() API and avoid conflicts with the cpumask_next_wrap() API change. If that doesn't work, you either carry a patch in -next until both branches end up upstream or I merge a stable bitmap branch from Yury with a fix on top. Thanks. -- Catalin
