On 1/27/25 03:59, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > The following commits are also in Linus Torvalds' tree as different > commits (but the same patches): > > 0217859ce172 ("module: sign with sha512 instead of sha1 by default") > 0dea980a17a3 ("module: sysfs: Drop member 'module_sect_attrs::nsections'") > 0e436d14d0b9 ("module: Put known GPL offenders in an array") > 25aa76116052 ("module: Constify 'struct module_attribute'") > 570f7776db9c ("module: Split module_enable_rodata_ro()") > 75b519abc918 ("module: sysfs: Simplify section attribute allocation") > 8c82fb5240f7 ("module: Extend the preempt disabled section in dereference_symbol_descriptor().") > 993026197341 ("params: Prepare for 'const struct module_attribute *'") > 9b894ee43337 ("module: Don't fail module loading when setting ro_after_init section RO failed") > c027a83a0375 ("module: sysfs: Drop member 'module_sect_attr::address'") > cb80af8451df ("module: Handle 'struct module_version_attribute' as const") > cd8026d4bda8 ("module: sysfs: Drop 'struct module_sect_attr'") > e6ea40687ff0 ("module: sysfs: Use const 'struct bin_attribute'") > fc15d675bc49 ("module: sysfs: Add notes attributes through attribute_group") > > Presumably rebased before asking Linus to merge them :-( Right, I rebased modules-next locally, pushed a tag for a pull request which has been merged, but I forgot to push the actual branch. Sorry about that, it should be fixed now. I could have arguably saved myself time and trouble by not rebasing modules-next in this case, which might have been also better from a testing perspective. -- Thanks, Petr