Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 07:00:43PM +0900, Akira Yokosawa wrote:
>> [+CC: linux-doc]
>>
>> Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Today's linux-next build (htmldocs) produced this warning:
>>>
>>> Documentation/power/video.rst:213: WARNING: Footnote [#] is not referenced. [ref.footnote]
>>>
>>> This warning has presumably been there for a long time.
>>>
>>> I don't know what causes it - maybe it needs a space before the opening
>>> bracket?
>>
>> Stephen, fhve you upgraded your Sphinx recently?
>>
>> In "Bugs Fixed" section of Sphinx 8.1.0 changelog [1], there is an item which
>> reads:
>>
>> - #12730: The UnreferencedFootnotesDetector transform has been improved
>> to more consistently detect unreferenced footnotes. Note, the priority
>> of the transform has been changed from 200 to 622, so that it now runs
>> after the docutils Footnotes resolution transform. Patch by Chris Sewell.
>>
>> So the above warning is real and prior versions of Sphinx just can't flag it.
>>
>> To silence it, you need to get rid of the unreferenced footnote, I guess.
>
> Hi Akira,
>
> I think the culprit [#f3] footnote (that triggers the warning) refers to
> Toshiba Satellite P10-554 notebook, where s3_bios and s3_resume work only on
> uniprocessor kernel. The proper fix will be probably adding a space before
> the footnote.
>
Ahh, you mean the referencing side of the footnote in that table.
Yes, you are right. I was lazy and didn't look closely at that jumbo change.
Point taken!
Thank you.
Akira
