Hi Alex, On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 18:20:50 +0000 "Bondarev, Alex" <alexbnd@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 23, 2024 at 04:16:03PM +0000, Bondarev, Alex wrote: > > I'm part of a team in AWS that uses the linux-next branch with canonical's > > ppa to test for build success. > > git: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git > > ppa: ppa:canonical-kernel-team/ppa > > > As a result of this daily test (we try the latest available at time of > > testing), we have almost immediate knowledge of the "goodness" of the branch > > (if the machine doesn't boot after update of if the compilation fails). We > > are currently running build on aarch64 and x86_64 types. > > > > The question is should we notify via a mailing list or a single destination > > about this failure? Will it improve the detection time for a bad merge? Thanks for testing! Notifications should be sent to linux-next@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and cc'd to linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and any developers or maintainers that you think may be involved with the code causing problems. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell
Attachment:
pgp9hC2y1vCXQ.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
