On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 4:10 AM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This > is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial > conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree > is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating > with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly > complex conflicts. Sorry, I missed to reply earlier, but this looked good to me too. Thanks! Cheers, Miguel
