On Mon, Dec 09 2024 at 12:21, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote: > On Mon, Dec 9, 2024 at 11:45 AM Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Mon, 9 Dec 2024 12:08:42 +0100 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > Why is this in -mm ? >> >> Because >> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241206225204.4008261-1-surenb@xxxxxxxxxx/T/#u >> needs it. >> >> > I agreed with Suren I'd take them through >> > tip/perf/core to go along with Andrii's uprobe patch that relies on >> > them. > > Both trees now have changes depending on those patches. If we can't > have them in both trees then I can rework my last patchset in the mm > tree to use old seqcount code and not require those patches, but we > will have to deal with the merge conflicts later. Usually one tree picks the changes up into a seperate branch based on -rc1 and declares that branch immutable by tagging it. Both trees then can merge it into their respective branches which depend on it. Thanks, tglx
